Unit 1.2. Designing e-government systems for women’s empowerment and gender equality

1.2.1. Introduction

The importance of gender-sensitive institutional design in e-government systems has been acknowledged for over a decade in international development circles (Hijab and Zimbrano 2008; Huyer 2010; UNPOG 2013; cited in IT for Change 2015)19. Despite this, the majority of governments continue to treat e-government policy and programming as a gender-neutral exercise, with scant attention to the differentiated access to, and impact of, digital technologies, upon women and men (UNESCAP 2016)20.

Only 61 of the 193 member states surveyed under the UN E-Government Survey (2016) offer tailored online government services to women. Moreover, only about one-third of the countries surveyed offer online services focused on poor, persons with disabilities and older persons (UN E-government Survey 2016)21. The majority of countries surveyed do not collect sex-disaggregated data on uptake of e-services and also do not collect basic data on women’s access to connectivity (Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development 2014)22. What this implies is that in the design of e-government, citizen-users are imagined as a homogeneous group. The differences in citizen experiences of governance stemming from socio-structural factors such as gender, class, caste, race, religion, age, disability, rural-urban location, are not taken into account. Further, there is no tracking of the extent to which e-government can promote gender-transformative outcomes.

However, a few pockets of excellence in gender-responsive design do exist, across the three main components of e-government systems – e-service delivery, digitally-mediated citizen participation, and connectivity architecture (UNESCAP 2016)23. Drawing upon key findings from a multi-country research study of such good practices across the Asia-Pacific (UNESCAP 2016)24, this Unit discusses the key dimensions of what it takes to build e-government systems that promote women’s empowerment and gender equality.

1.2.2. Designing gender-responsive e-government systems

a. Institutional commitment to women’s empowerment and gender equality

E-government approaches can institutionalise a strategic commitment to women’s empowerment and gender equality, through several measures:

i. Strategic vision documents and policy guidelines for e-government – such as e-government master plans, digital agenda vision statements, ICT plans and policies – that incorporate gender perspectives.

In Bangladesh, the Digital Bangladesh strategy of the Office of the Prime Minister seeks to reduce inefficiencies in public service delivery, increase transparency, and improve governance. A key aim of ‘Digital Bangladesh’ is to reduce the digital divide between women and men, and create an enabling environment where both sexes can realise their empowerment potential (Genilo, 2018)25. Similarly, in the Philippines, the Philippine Digital Strategy and the e-Government Master Plan acknowledge the role of ICTs for women’s empowerment and outline plans of action that are aligned with the government’s women’s empowerment agenda In the Republic of Korea, right from the initial years, connectivity policy and programming has focused on integrating a gender perspective. For example, the Framework Act on Informatisation Promotion and the Act on Eliminating the Digital Divide (1995) clearly provided for the institutionalisation of digital literacy programmes for women (UNESCAP 2016)26.

ii. Institutionalising gender mainstreaming in all aspects of e-government.

Gender mainstreaming in public policy refers to the idea that gender perspectives and attention to the goal of gender equality are central to all activities - policy development, research, advocacy/ dialogue, legislation, resource allocation, and planning, implementation and monitoring of programmes and projects” (UN Women, accessed 2017)27.

In Bangladesh, the Access to Information Programme has appointed gender focal points in all ministries, which has furthered women’s inclusion in digital innovations across all levels of government. For example, the presence of the gender focal point has led to the ICT Department, Ministry of Posts, Telecommunications and IT, developing the “She Power Project”. This initiative aims to provide an enabling environment for women’s participation in the ICT sector, by equipping them with digital skills for ICT careers and/or digital enterprise (Genilo 2017)28.

Gender mainstreaming efforts in e-government are strengthened when backed by the existence of overarching legal and policy frameworks, and clear gender budgeting rules (UNESCAP 2016)29. In the Philippines, policies on gender equality and women’s rights provide a guiding framework for e-government policies and strategies. The government’s gender mainstreaming strategy has been institutionalised through the enactment of the Magna Carta of Women, in 2009. The Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Magna Carta of Women focuses on “supporting, aligning, and consolidating existing efforts of government agencies including ICT and e-Government strategies and activities like “Bottom up Budgeting”, that seek to further gender equality”.

A major obstacle to gender mainstreaming in e-government is the mind-set among officials in many sectoral ministries that gender mainstreaming is an additional reporting burden. Through the training of bureaucracy, a strong, system-wide buy in is possible to obtain, so that the relevance of gender mainstreaming and its protocols are appreciated. Research studies by the Ministry of Women’s Affairs in the Republic of Korea clearly reveal the importance of capacity development of government functionaries in improving inter-ministerial cooperation (UNESCAP 2016a)30.

iii. The collection of sex-disaggregated statistics about uptake of e-government.

Unless disaggregated by sex, statistics cannot help address questions, such as “How many women-only online services are available?”; “Is women’s participation in the online spaces of state-citizen interaction equal to that of men?”; “How many women use the Internet compared to men?” (UNESCAP 2016)31. Government agencies need sex-disaggregated data to map existing and emerging exclusions in e-service delivery, and recalibrate the design of e-service delivery, e-participation and connectivity programmes. Australia and the Republic of Korea have both put in place systems for collecting sex-disaggregated data on citizen uptake of e-government.

iv. Inter-ministerial mechanisms for effective coordination between e-government agency, national women’s machinery and sectoral agencies.

The government of Australia follows an effective system for review and revamping of e-service design. A series of design workshops are carried out as part of which ministry focal points, gender experts and e-government functionaries come together at periodic intervals for an intensive collective brainstorming. Existing e-services are reviewed from a gender perspective, and ways to enhance gender responsiveness are discussed (EGM 2016)32. Such a forum can be an important mechanism not only for coordination, but innovation and institutionalisation. Women’s Ministries also need to lead by example and support other ministries in envisioning, designing, implementing and monitoring gender-responsive programmes. The Ministry of Women and Children's Affairs, Bangladesh, has developed an app to fight violence against women and an e-tax payment and inheritance calculator that builds women’s awareness of their inheritance rights and the country’s taxation system (Genilo 2017)33.

b. Adopting an institutional perspective for gender-transformative e-government design

The extent to which e-government ecosystems further women’s empowerment and gender equality is predicated upon effective design. An institutional framework , focusing on the creation and implementation of norms, rules and practices for gender transformative governance cultures, is critical for such design(UNESCAP 2016)34.

A brief summary of the necessary shifts to guide institutional change , with respect to the three main components of e-government systems, e-service delivery, digitally-mediated citizen participation and connectivity architecture, is provided below. Modules 2, 3 and 4 contain a detailed blueprint of how to work towards these shifts.

B1. E-service delivery

i. Shifts in Norms

  1. Ensuring that gender and e-service delivery policies go hand-in-hand.

    Institutional ownership of the gender mainstreaming agenda in sectoral e-government policymaking processes (across agriculture, health, education and other domains) is key to promoting women’s empowerment and gender equality through technology. Gender equality considerations should be adopted at each stage of the e-government maturation process (UNPOG, cited in UNESCAP 2016)35:

    • Emerging stage: There should be efforts for creating an online presence for the national gender machinery and putting gender policies online.
    • Enhanced stage: When e-government proceeds to this stage where applications for schemes and programmes are downloadable, care should be taken to ensure that such applications for initiatives of the ministry of women are available.
    • Transactional stage: Individualized services for women should be available.
    • Connected stage: There should be one-stop-shop portals for women-directed services as well as integration of such services with generic one-stop-shop portals.
  2. Incorporating gender based inclusion as a norm in e-service delivery systems.

    E-citizen charters offer an important route for institutionalising norms for gender-responsive services. Norms should provide freedom of choice of service delivery channels/ modes, enable a proper balance of technology and human elements in service delivery design, and provide avenues for consulting women:

    • Women should be able to opt for either online or offline channels, based on their preferences.
    • Support should be provided for tracking of applications and individual and collective grievance redress.
    • Regular and ongoing consultations should be undertaken to assess women’s needs and priorities accurately.

ii. Shifts in rules

  1. Formulating clear rules to cushion e-services from political volatility.

    Gender-responsive e-service delivery implementation is contingent upon political will and commitment in the highest tiers of governments. It requires specialised agencies with dedicated budgets and specific, time-bound targets for the development of women-directed services and gender-responsive roll-out. To ensure timely progress towards these ends, clear rules, backed by appropriate public policy and legislative processes for e-service delivery programmes should be developed.

  2. Institutionalised arrangements for effective coordination between national women’s machinery and e-government agency.

    The Ministry of Women should be entrusted with the responsibility of evolving policy guidelines on ‘women’s digital citizenship and e-government’ as a basic protocol for other departments and ministries. These policy guidelines should ensure that decision-making structures in e-government include women, and e-service delivery design is participatory, involving consultations with women, women’s organisations working on various issues, and gender experts. The partnership between the e-government department and the national women’s ministry should also be institutionalised to ensure sustainability.

  3. Technology governance frameworks for gender-inclusive service delivery.

    Interoperability protocols that enable alignment between business processes, information and data architectures of different departments/agencies, contributes to better inter-ministerial coordination in e-service delivery efforts.

    The adoption of open, non-proprietary standards and tools in the design of e-service delivery initiatives is essential, to prevent the exclusion of citizens accessing e-services from low-end devices and slow connections. Considering that the majority of women face affordability barriers in terms of access to connectivity (and by extension, e-services), such standards setting is essential for gender-inclusive service delivery. Standards that support local language content is another priority area.

    The design of data taxonomies in beneficiary databases in e-service delivery systems becomes extremely important for inclusive targeting. For example, the state government of Tamil Nadu, India, came out with a welfare policy for transgenders in 2016, that led to provisions for gender dysphoric individuals to record their ‘third gender’ status in entitlement application forms. The government of Malaysia’s national poverty databank (e-Kasih) records individual incomes of each household member separately, instead of recording aggregate household level income. This is to account for intra-household gender disparities in income distribution, and ensure that households are not treated as a homogenous unit, in the design of economic empowerment programmes (Kuga Thas 2017)36.

    Further, governments should invest in the development of effective legal-policy frameworks for data protection and open data that safeguard vulnerable women’s right to privacy and further their capabilities to demand accountability from service providers.

  4. Frameworks for governing Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP).

    To fill expertise gaps in the design and roll-out of e-service delivery, governments often resort to PPP arrangements. To ensure that citizen accountability in e-service delivery systems is not undermined, these arrangements should be backed by clear partnership agreements that delineate respective roles and responsibilities of state agencies and private sector partners in terms of fulfilling service delivery guarantees to vulnerable women.

iii. Shifts in Practices

  1. Encouraging public interest intermediation of e-service delivery.

    Marginalised women with limited access to connectivity and lacking digital literacy often need intermediation/ facilitation to take advantage of emerging e-services. To ensure that new layers of vested interests do not emerge to fill this gap, it becomes important for governments to promote public interest intermediation of e-service delivery systems. Even in mature e-government contexts, some degree of intermediation may be necessary, especially to support first time users, migrants, older populations and remote and rural communities. Partnerships with civil society organisations for information and service intermediation, and for research and monitoring of e-service delivery through gender audits may be useful.

  2. Monitoring e-government through a ‘digital citizenship index’.

    The efficacy of e-government for women’s empowerment depends very much on reliable statistics that support monitoring and evaluation. At the national level, it would be useful to build the data capacity for collecting and collating sex-disaggregated data for relevant indicators within that specific context. These should include (UNESCAP 2016):

    • service delivery aspects including the number of women-oriented services and number of women accessing m-services;
    • human capacity issues like digital literacy;
    • telecommunications indicators like individual data subscription; and
    • institutional maturity dimensions like gender policies in services and infrastructure, ICT policy integration in the women’s machinery and the gendering of data protection laws.

B2. Citizen participation

i. Shifts in Norms

  1. Guaranteeing women’s rights to full participation in digital democracy.

    Pre-digital legislative frameworks that respect, protect, and promote participation guarantees should be brought up to speed with digital realities. For example, open data protocols need to be harmonised with freedom of information legislation. Similarly, protection from gender-based hate speech in online environments should be incorporated in freedom of expression laws. Datafication of state-citizen interactions brings about new concerns for the right to privacy, which should be addressed through effective data protection legislation.

ii. Shifts in rules

  1. Ensuring that online citizen engagement is tied to women’s ‘right to be heard’.

    Online consultations should be backed by clear guidelines for transparency and answerability, to ensure that outcomes of such processes are not arbitrarily altered. It is also vital to combine offline and online processes and use emerging opportunities for online participation to bring women and girls into discussions in the public domain.

iii. Shifts in practices

  1. Investing in women’s digital capabilities.

    National digital literacy programmes should incorporate a well-defined women-directed component. While digital literacy is often seen as a one-time effort, it is increasingly evident that the technical and social aspects of e-citizenship need various and continuing interventions. Today information, media and data literacies are very much a part of the basic skill set needed to assert one’s rights. The next generation of young women will need to be equipped through formal and non-formal systems so that they develop a discerning and independent relationship with spaces for active citizenship.

B3. Connectivity architectures

i. Shifts in Norms

  1. Universalising access to the Internet, for women.

    The UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression (2011) has observed that: "without Internet access, which facilitates economic development and the enjoyment of a range of human rights, marginalized groups and developing States remain trapped in a disadvantaged situation, thereby perpetuating inequality both within and between States”.

    Internet access has become integral to individual well-being and full participation in social, economic and political life. However, affordability and gender social norms continue to remain a major barrier to women’s access to connectivity architectures and effective use of the Internet. Against this backdrop, policy guarantees that ensure a data connection of a minimum quality and quantity for women become critical to promote universal access for women.

ii. Shifts in Rules

  1. Deploying a range of policy instruments and programmes for gender-responsive universal access.

    This can assume a range of forms:

    • introducing a gender budget in the Universal Service Fund to support a mobile data allowance for marginalised women, development of safe and gender-inclusive telecentre models, and efforts to promote women’s digital literacy.
    • investing in the development of robust national level statistics on sex-disaggregated patterns of access and use of the Internet, so that women’s needs and priorities are effectively addressed, when evolving connectivity policies and programmes.
    • including clear targets to measure progress on gender equality in the design of connectivity policy frameworks.
    • addressing gender based violence through robust legal-institutional frameworks, to ensure a rewarding connectivity experience for women.

iii. Shifts in Practices

  1. Catalysing meaningful cultures of use through a public access, telecentre model.

    Public access spaces, if designed appropriately, can contribute to the creation of meaningful cultures of use among women at the grassroots. Successful models are those that have emphasised co-ownership by local women’s collectives, and empathetic and gender-responsive cultures of facilitation. The creative combining of digital possibilities with traditional methods for strengthening information, learning and knowledge processes in communities is equally important. National and global networks (such as Telecentre.org) that enable knowledge sharing and exchange of ‘good practice’ models are useful repositories to consult for insights around the development of such gender-responsive models.

  2. Promoting the effective use of mobile phones in citizen outreach:

    As mobile phones break the accessibility barrier for women, m-services are a critical frontier for women’s access to information, services and participation. The next wave of Internet users will be accessing the Internet over the mobile (ITU 2016)37. The game-changing possibilities of mobile phones for information outreach and service delivery need to be leveraged.

    At the same time, it is important to continue to invest in fixed broadband architecture. As the (ITU 2012)38 has highlighted: “ [A total reliance on mobile broadband] effectively restricts the type and quality of applications and services that users can access over the Internet...while mobile-broadband technology helps to increase coverage and offer mobility, the mobile networks and services currently in place usually only allow limited data access, at lower speeds, which often makes mobile-broadband subscriptions unsuitable for intensive users, such as businesses and institutions. High-speed, reliable broadband access is particularly important for the delivery of vital public services, such as those related to education, health and government.”

    Thus, only through a strategy that pays equal attention to mobile and fixed broadband infrastructure development can equitable access to quality Internet be guaranteed.

Unit Summary

E-government approaches can institutionalise a strategic commitment to women’s empowerment and gender equality, through:

  1. incorporating gender perspectives in strategic vision documents and policy guidelines for e-government; such as e-government master plans, digital agenda vision statements, ICT plans and policies,
  2. institutionalising gender mainstreaming in all aspects of e-government,
  3. investing in the collection of sex-disaggregated statistics about uptake of e-government, and
  4. setting up inter-ministerial mechanisms for effective coordination between e-government agency, national women’s machinery and sectoral agencies.

In addition to institutional commitment, effective design of the key components of e-government ecosystems – e-service delivery, digitally-mediated citizen participation, and connectivity architectures – is critical to further women’s empowerment and gender equality. Towards this, an institutional perspective focusing on the introduction and reinforcement of norms, rules and practices for gender transformative governance cultures, is particularly helpful. The key elements of such an approach are summarised below:

  E-service delivery Digitally-mediated citizen participation Connectivity architectures
Shifts in Norms
  • Ensure that gender and e-service delivery policies go hand-in-hand.
  • Incorporate gender based inclusion as a norm in e-service delivery systems.
  • Guarantee women’s rights to full participation in digital democracy.
  • Universalise access to the Internet, for women.
Shifts in Rules
  • Formulate clear rules to cushion e-services from political volatility.
  • Build institutionalised arrangements for effective coordination between national women’s machinery and e-government agency.
  • Evolve technology governance frameworks for gender-inclusive service delivery, and for governing Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP).
  • Ensure that online citizen engagement is tied to women’s ‘right to be heard’.
  • Deploy a range of policy instruments and programmes for gender-responsive universal access.
Shifts in Practices
  • Encourage public interest intermediation of e-service delivery
  • Monitor e-government through a ‘digital citizenship index’.
  • Invest in women’s digital capabilities.
  • Catalyse meaningful cultures of use through a public access, telecentre model.
  • Promote the effective use of mobile phones in citizen outreach.

 

 


  1. 19 IT for Change. (2015), op.cit.
  2. 20 UNESCAP. (2016), op.cit.
  3. 21 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2016). United Nations e-government survey 2016: e-government in support of sustainable development. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2016, July 2016.
  4. 22 Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development. (2014). Measuring ICT and gender: an assessment. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdtlstict2014d1_en.pdf, 2014.
  5. 23 UNESCAP. (2016), op.cit.
  6. 24 Ibid.
  7. 25 Genilo, J.(2017). Egovernment for women's empowerment: A state of art analysis of Bangladesh
  8. 26 UNESCAP (2016), op.cit.
  9. 27 United Nations Women. Gender Mainstreaming. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/gendermainstreaming.htm, accessed 2017.
  10. 28 Genilo, J.(2017). Egovernment for women's empowerment: A state of art analysis of Bangladesh
  11. 29 UNESCAP. (2016), op.cit.
  12. 30 UNESCAP. (2016a). Expert Group Meeting on Enhancing Capacity to Promote E-government for Women’s Empowerment in Asia and the Pacific.
  13. 31 UNESCAP. (2016), op.cit.
  14. 32 UNESCAP(2016a), op.cit.
  15. 33 Genilo, J.(2017). Egovernment for women's empowerment: A state of art analysis of Bangladesh
  16. 34 UNESCAP (2016), op.cit.
  17. 35 Ibid.
  18. 36 Kuga Thas, A. (2017). A gender analysis of the e-government system: State of the art review: Malaysia.
  19. 37 International Telecommunication Union. (2016). Measuring the information society report. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/misr2016/MISR2016-w4.pdf, 2016.
  20. 38 International Telecommunication Union. (2012). Measuring the information society report. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/ind/D-IND-ICTOI-2012-SUM-PDF-E.pdf, 2012.

Glossary Text for Tooltips

Interoperability

This is the technical precondition for interdepartmental coordination in e-service delivery. It involves working on alignments of three different kinds: (a) alignments between business processes and information architectures of different departments/agencies for better collaboration and inter-agency coordination in service delivery (organisational interoperability) (b) alignments between data taxonomies of different departments and agencies to enable meaningful public information processing that supports decision-making. (c) alignments between interconnection, content management, metadata and security standards of different departments and agencies to enable networked sharing of information within government.

non-proprietary standards

 

Public interest intermediation

A system where facilitating access to e-information and service delivery systems for members of marginalised groups is considered a public service obligation, and not a private commercial activity for earning brokerage/commission.

Datafication

As the Internet increasingly intertwines with social, economic and political life, personal and behavioural data relating to most aspects of our lives are captured by Internet platforms. Increasingly, sophisticated data mining and pattern analysis techniques, popularly referred to as ‘Big Data analysis’, enable this data to be leveraged for commercial and public interest decisionmaking. For example, behavioural data from search engines can be leveraged by companies seeking to expand their marketing base, and social media analysis can help governments map citizen behaviour. As the collection, aggregation and analysis of data proliferates, so does its use in economic and public policy decision-making. This trend is known as datafication.

Connectivity architectures

This Online Toolkit uses the term to refer to the arrangements for the development and governance of broadband infrastructure backbones and Internet services.